BCCI mulls cutting India–Pakistan group ties after Pahalgam massacre

BCCI mulls cutting India–Pakistan group ties after Pahalgam massacre

India’s worst terror strike in more than a decade is beginning to redraw the country’s sporting calendar. Senior officials inside the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) confirmed on Wednesday that the governing body is preparing to remove scheduled India‑versus‑Pakistan group‑stage fixtures from all forthcoming International Cricket Council (ICC) events, following the massacre of 28 civilians by militants in the tourist town of Pahalgam on 23 April. Latest news & breaking headlines

“When lives are lost so senselessly, cricket cannot continue in a vacuum,” a top BCCI office‑bearer told The Indian Herald on condition of anonymity. “The board will not entertain bilateral or tournament group games against Pakistan until there is demonstrable action against the perpetrators and their sponsors.”

Although the BCCI has publicly limited itself to a minute’s silence and black‑armband tribute during Tuesday night’s IPL contest in Hyderabad, BCCI senior administrators met in Mumbai on Wednesday morning, hours after New Delhi downgraded diplomatic ties with Islamabad and suspended key clauses of the Indus Waters Treaty. Financial Times

‘Security first’ domino effect

The fallout from the Pahalgam attack, which eyewitnesses say was carried out by gunmen firing indiscriminately on tourist buses, has been swift and multidimensional. The Home Ministry has already ordered a security review of all high‑profile sporting events, including the ICC Champions Trophy pencilled in for late 2025 in Sri Lanka and India.

Under existing ICC schedules, India and Pakistan were slotted into the same preliminary group to maximise broadcast revenue, mirroring the 2023 ODI World Cup format. Advertising packages for that single encounter were expected to exceed ₹1,200 crore. If the BCCI formally requests a redraw, it would be the first time cricket’s biggest box‑office rivalry has been voluntarily shelved at the group stage of a multilateral competition.

ICC chief executive Geoff Allardice declined to comment on “speculative correspondence,” but a person familiar with the matter said any formal plea from the BCCI “would carry enormous weight” because India accounts for more than 70 per cent of the world body’s annual media income.

Political tailwinds

The sporting stance mirrors the hardening mood in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Parliament that Pakistan‑based groups had “orchestrated a massacre of innocents” and vowed that the assailants “will face justice.” Latest news & breaking headlines In parallel, the external affairs ministry began expelling Pakistani diplomatic staff and halting cross‑border bus services, moves analysts say leave little space for the kind of neighbourly symbolism an India–Pakistan cricket clash usually represents. Financial Times

Shashi Tharoor, opposition MP and former United Nations official, urged caution: “We must not let terrorists hijack the people‑to‑people links that cricket embodies. However, safety of fans and players is paramount, and the onus lies on Pakistan to end support for extremism.”

Commercial tremors

Sponsors are already recalibrating. Two major consumer‑electronics brands told Business Line they would seek rebates from the ICC marketing arm if the marquee tie is scrapped, arguing that their rate cards were built around an India–Pakistan guarantee. Broadcaster Star Sports declined to reveal contractual clauses but insiders admitted “force majeure linked to national security” could be invoked.

Sport‑industry consultant Indranil Das Blah said the BCCI’s hand is far stronger than during the post‑Pulwama boycott calls of 2019. “Back then, India could still push for diplomatic isolation without shredding the tournament grid. Now, after Pahalgam, the government’s retaliatory steps give the board a clear political mandate.”

What next?

  • Formal letter to ICC: The BCCI’s legal cell is drafting a missive that, according to officials, will go out “within 72 hours,” citing the government’s security advisory as the basis for a redraw.
  • Potential group reshuffle: Tournament organisers would likely split India and Pakistan into separate pools, maintaining the possibility of a high‑stakes knockout meeting that can be staged at a neutral venue under heightened security.
  • Broadcast negotiations: Rights‑holders are expected to demand revised inventory or monetary compensation—talks that could reshape the commercial architecture of ICC events.

Meanwhile, security forces continued a large‑scale manhunt in the forested hills above Pahalgam on Thursday, saying they had killed two militants believed to be linked to Lashkar‑e‑Taiba. The Times of India

Bigger than cricket

For survivors such as 23‑year‑old horse handler Adil Hussain Shah, who shielded tourists during the attack, the debate over fixtures is academic. “I just want the valley peaceful again,” he told local reporters from his hospital bed. Shah lost his left arm to a bullet wound but hopes to ride again.

Whether the BCCI’s proposed boycott adds pressure on Islamabad—or merely inflames sporting passions—remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: after Pahalgam, the boundary line between politics and play has moved once more, and cricket’s most celebrated rivalry may be the first casualty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *